Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This second Aedes aegypti RNA-Seq on AB SOLiD System 3.0 covers 1.4 Gb with 38.8 million reads but again shows problematic Q30 (0%), compounded by large read count and platform limitations. The SOLID chemistry's insufficient base-quality calls restrict genomic accuracy. Mosquito research should use contemporary sequencing platforms.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0