Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
93/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Danaus plexippus (monarch butterfly) bulk RNA-Seq on HiSeq 4000 covers 950 Mb with 19 million reads and good quality (97.8% Q20, 96% Q30), providing transcriptome data for this iconic migratory butterfly. The dataset suits studying gene expression related to migration, development, and environmental responses. Butterfly evolution and migration-biology studies can use this monarch RNA-seq.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0