Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
92/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This third Danaus plexippus RNA-Seq on HiSeq 4000 covers 1.01 Gb with 20.1 million reads and good quality (97.8% Q20, 96% Q30), adding further monarch-butterfly transcriptome depth. The three D. plexippus samples enable comprehensive life-cycle expression studies. Monarch conservation and biology can aggregate all three butterfly datasets.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0