Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
92/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This whole genome sequencing dataset from a Salmonella enterica strain was generated using Illumina HiSeq 2500 short-read technology, delivering ~2.9M reads across 581M bases with excellent quality metrics (97.5% Q20 bases). The high GC content (51.7%) and minimal sequence artifacts (0.001% N content) make it well-suited for bacterial genome assembly, variant calling, and comparative genomic analysis of this enteric pathogen.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0