← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Anopheles aquasalis
Instrument
454 GS Junior
Platform
LS454
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
86936146
reported
total reads
172244
reported
n content pct
0.01
measured
pct q20 bases
75.6
measured
pct q30 bases
41.6
measured
gc content pct
50.9
measured
mean read length
350.8
measured
mean base quality
27.1
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
29.5
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 33/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
41.6
measured
×1
0%
mean base quality
27.1
measured
×0.6
0%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
29.5
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
37 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0