Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Deep transcriptome coverage of the moth species Helicoverpa armigera was achieved using Illumina HiSeq 4000 RNA-seq, generating 26.6M reads across 8B bases with exceptional quality (98.4% Q20, 95.7% Q30). This high-quality, high-depth dataset is well-positioned for comprehensive gene expression analysis, splice variant discovery, and developmental transcriptomics in this agricultural pest insect.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0