Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
99/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Drosophila simulans bulk RNA-Seq on HiSeq 1000 spans 5.6 Gb with 30.9 million reads, showing perfect base composition (0% N-content) and good quality (96.7% Q20, 89.5% Q30), providing clean transcriptome data for this Drosophila species related to D. melanogaster. The dataset suits comparative transcriptomics and species-difference studies. Drosophila molecular evolution can use this sister-species RNA-seq.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0