Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (rice leaf folder) bulk RNA-Seq on Illumina Genome Analyzer II covers 3.3 Gb with 21.9 million reads and lower quality (86.9% Q20, 68.2% Q30), providing transcriptome data for this economically important rice pest despite quality limitations. The dataset enables studying pest-specific traits. Rice-crop protection can use this insect-pest RNA-seq.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0