Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
99/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This bulk RNA-seq dataset from the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum was generated using Illumina HiSeq 2500, yielding 40.9M reads with excellent quality (98.1% Q20, 95.4% Q30). The high read count and quality enable deep transcriptome coverage for comprehensive gene expression studies in this established insect model.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0