Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
88/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This RNA-seq dataset from the cotton aphid Aphis gossypii was generated on Illumina HiSeq 2000, producing 26.1M reads across 2.61B bases. Note that quality metrics are moderate (91% Q20, 84.8% Q30), placing this at the lower end of typical RNA-seq quality; preprocessing and careful filtering are recommended before downstream analysis of this agricultural pest transcriptome.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0