Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
92/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This RNA-seq dataset captures transcriptome-wide expression in the disease vector mosquito Aedes aegypti using NextSeq 500 sequencing, producing ~16.5M reads with high Q-score quality (98.2% Q20). Note the slightly elevated N content (0.164%) compared to typical runs; nevertheless, the dataset supports vector biology studies and can interrogate pathogen-vector interaction mechanisms.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0