Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
98/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This bulk RNA-seq dataset from the rice striped stem borer Chilo suppressalis was generated using Illumina HiSeq 2500, capturing 33.2M reads across 9.95B bases with good quality (96.5% Q20, 91.5% Q30). The high depth supports comprehensive analysis of pest insect transcriptomics, including stress responses and development-dependent gene expression.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0