SRR9620173

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

95/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

This bulk RNA-seq dataset from the passion vine butterfly Heliconius erato was generated using Illumina HiSeq 4000, producing 12.7M reads across 1.9B bases with exceptional quality (98.7% Q20, 96.1% Q30). The high-quality data enable detailed transcriptomics of this lepidopteran, supporting studies of adaptation, mimicry, and developmental processes.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Heliconius erato

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 4000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 1900841100 reported

total reads 12672274 reported

n content pct 0.008 measured

pct q20 bases 98.7 measured

pct q30 bases 96.1 measured

gc content pct 42.5 measured

mean read length 75 measured

mean base quality 39.3 measured

adapter content pct 0.01 measured

duplication rate pct 43.3 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 95/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 96.1 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 39.3 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0.01 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 43.3 measured ×0.4 70%

QC cost 23 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0