Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
99/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This bulk RNA-seq dataset from the Argentine ant Linepithema humile was generated using Illumina HiSeq 4000, capturing 21.2M reads across 4.24B bases with excellent quality (97.7% Q20, 94.3% Q30). The high-quality coverage enables transcriptome-wide analysis of this social insect, supporting studies of colony-level behavior and organization.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0