Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
96/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Linepithema humile (Argentine ant) RNA-Seq on HiSeq 4000 covers 3.98 Gb with 19.9 million reads and good quality (97.9% Q20, 94.8% Q30), providing transcriptome data for this successful invasive ant species. The dataset suits studying invasion-associated gene expression and social behavior. Ant genomics and invasion ecology can use this invasive-species RNA-seq.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0