Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
95/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This bulk RNA-seq dataset from the monarch butterfly Danaus plexippus was generated on the BGISEQ-500 platform, producing 24.9M reads across 1.24B bases with exceptional quality (99.1% Q20, 94% Q30) and zero N content. The high-quality data from this alternative platform enable robust butterfly transcriptomics and can support comparative studies across sequencing technologies.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0