SRR9678454

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

93/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

This bulk RNA-seq dataset from Drosophila simulans was generated on NextSeq 500, yielding 19M reads across 5.71B bases with excellent quality (97.7% Q20, 93.8% Q30). The high-quality data enable detailed transcriptome analysis of this model fruit fly.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Drosophila simulans

Instrument

NextSeq 500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 5714928000 reported

total reads 19049760 reported

n content pct 0.006 measured

pct q20 bases 97.7 measured

pct q30 bases 93.8 measured

gc content pct 46.7 measured

mean read length 150 measured

mean base quality 38.8 measured

adapter content pct 9.08 measured

duplication rate pct 21.7 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 93/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 93.8 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 38.8 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 9.08 measured ×0.4 61%

duplication rate pct 21.7 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 20 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0