Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
71/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This bulk RNA-seq dataset from the Drosophila species Scaptodrosophila lebanonensis was generated on NextSeq 500, producing 10.5M reads across 1.59B bases. Note that quality metrics are moderate (89.8% Q20, 83% Q30), placing this at the lower end of typical RNA-seq; preprocessing and quality filtering are recommended before transcript quantification in this lesser-studied dipteran model.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0