Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
93/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Apis mellifera bulk RNA-Seq dataset from the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform yields 27.8 million short reads (1.41 billion bases) with excellent quality (98.9% Q20, 96.9% Q30 bases, 0.011% N content). The high read depth and quality support robust differential expression analysis and transcript discovery across honey bee tissues. Searchable by insect transcriptomics, HiSeq 2500, and social insect biology, offering substantial coverage for quantitative expression studies.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0