Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
93/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Helicoverpa armigera bulk RNA-Seq dataset from the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform contains 22 million short reads (4.39 billion bases) with very good quality (92.3% Q20, 86.8% Q30 bytes). The high-quality reads enable robust expression profiling of this agricultural pest. Search terms: lepidopteran transcriptomics, HiSeq 2000, cotton pest genomics, insect development, applicable to pest management and insecticide resistance studies.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0