Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
98/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bulk RNA-seq of Myzus persicae from HiSeq 2500, 36M reads, 7.2B bases, 100bp. Excellent A grade (98/100, all measured) with Q30 of 94.7%, base quality of 36.5, and minimal adapter content; duplication of 34.48% (scored 90) is the only minor limiting factor but acceptable. Highly suitable for differential expression and assembly.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0