Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
99/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Anopheles gambiae (malaria mosquito) bulk RNA-Seq dataset on the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform contains 82.6 million short reads (16.68 billion bases) with exceptional quality (97.2% Q20, 94.2% Q30 bases, 0.003% N content). The depth and quality support comprehensive transcriptome studies of this medically important vector species, searchable by vector biology, HiSeq 2500 transcriptomics, and insect pathogenesis. The high-quality profile is well-suited for regulatory element discovery and tissue-specific expression mapping.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0