Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
68/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This D. melanogaster whole-genome sequencing dataset from the Illumina Genome Analyzer platform contains 147.8 million reads (5.27 billion bases) with extrapolated 37.6× coverage and moderate quality (45.9% Q20, 31.7% Q30 bases), indicating older-generation short-read sequencing. The large read count supports searches for deep WGS coverage, Genome Analyzer datasets, and Drosophila genomics. However, the elevated N-content (2.23%) and lower Q30 percentage may complicate variant calling and assembly.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0