Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
52/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This D. melanogaster WGS dataset from the Illumina Genome Analyzer platform contains 83 million reads (2.99 billion bases) with extrapolated 21.3× coverage and moderate quality (66.1% Q20, 56.1% Q30 bytes). The elevated N-content (2.426%) indicates potential sequencing artifacts or adapter contamination. Searchable by Drosophila genomics, Genome Analyzer, lower-quality WGS, this dataset may require careful filtering before variant annotation.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0