Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
46/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This D. melanogaster WGS dataset from the Illumina Genome Analyzer platform contains 69.1 million reads (2.49 billion bases) with extrapolated 17.8× coverage and moderate quality (72.8% Q20, 64.3% Q30 bytes). The elevated N-content (2.366%) indicates potential contamination or quality issues. Searchable by Drosophila WGS, Genome Analyzer, lower-quality resequencing, this dataset requires careful quality filtering before reliable variant annotation.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0