← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
50/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Drosophila melanogaster
Instrument
Illumina Genome Analyzer
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
5 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
2791696896
reported
total reads
77547136
reported
mean coverage
19.9
extrapolated
n content pct
0.636
measured
pct q20 bases
66
measured
pct q30 bases
53.9
measured
gc content pct
40.5
measured
mean read length
36
measured
mean base quality
27.2
measured
adapter content pct
0.02
measured
duplication rate pct
4.57
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 50/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
19.9
extrapolated
×1.2
54%
pct q30 bases
53.9
measured
×1
0%
duplication rate pct
4.57
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
0.02
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
34 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0