Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
36/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Homo sapiens WES (whole-exome sequencing) dataset from the 454 GS FLX platform contains 2.79 million long reads (1.56 billion bases) with moderate quality (81.6% Q20, 49.6% Q30 bytes). The 454 long-read approach provides partial capture of human coding sequences. Search terms: human exome sequencing, WXS, 454 long-read, clinical genomics, variant discovery, applicable to disease-gene identification though less efficient than modern exome methods.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0