Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
55/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This D. melanogaster WGS dataset from the Illumina Genome Analyzer platform contains 161.6 million reads (29.49 billion bases) with extraordinarily high extrapolated coverage (210.6×) and excellent quality (81.7% Q20, 72% Q30 bases). The ultra-deep coverage from this classic platform supports highly sensitive variant discovery, copy number analysis, and comparative genomics. This dataset is exceptional for Drosophila sequencing depth and represents a major resource, searchable by deep WGS, Genome Analyzer, and population-level studies.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0