← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
43/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: partly measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Drosophila melanogaster
Instrument
Illumina Genome Analyzer
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
gc sd
10.88
measured
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
817426530
reported
total reads
9082517
reported
mean coverage
5.8
extrapolated
n content pct
3.334
measured
pct q20 bases
71.8
measured
sampled bases
45000000
measured
sampled reads
1000000
measured
gc content pct
41.6
measured
polyg tail pct
0
measured
read length sd
0
measured
quality dropoff
-9.5
measured
read length max
45
measured
read length min
45
measured
read length n50
45
measured
max base quality
26
measured
mean read length
45
measured
max n pct per pos
100
measured
mean base quality
19.5
measured
pct reads lt 100bp
100
measured
read length median
45
measured
adapter content pct
0.05
measured
median read quality
19.8
measured
duplication rate pct
3.82
measured
overrepresented top pct
0.19
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 43/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
5.8
extrapolated
×1.2
0%
duplication rate pct
3.82
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
0.05
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
41 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0