SRX015524

ENA first seen 2013

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

56/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Salpingoeca rosetta

Instrument

454 GS FLX Titanium

Platform

LS454

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 110724574 reported

total reads 216632 reported

n content pct 0.051 measured

pct q20 bases 91.3 measured

pct q30 bases 76.6 measured

gc content pct 53.4 measured

mean read length 341.3 measured

mean base quality 34 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 19.04 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 56/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 76.6 measured ×1 33%

duplication rate pct 19.04 measured ×0.5 66%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 30 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0