SRX019110

ENA first seen 2012

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

38/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Drosophila melanogaster

Instrument

Illumina Genome Analyzer

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

5 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 1813983048 reported

total reads 50388418 reported

mean coverage 13 extrapolated

n content pct 0.055 measured

pct q20 bases 91.4 measured

pct q30 bases 0 measured

gc content pct 41.1 measured

mean read length 36 measured

mean base quality 20.2 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 5.59 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 38/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 13 extrapolated ×1.2 23%

pct q30 bases 0 measured ×1 0%

duplication rate pct 5.59 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 15 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0