Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
53/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This D. melanogaster WGS dataset from the Illumina Genome Analyzer II platform contains 20.3 million reads (3.05 billion bases) with extrapolated 21.8× coverage and moderate quality (70.6% Q20, 48.7% Q30 bytes). The high N-content (4.858%) suggests possible sample contamination or systematic sequencing issues. Searchable by Drosophila WGS, Genome Analyzer II, this dataset requires pre-alignment QC filtering and may be better suited for SNP discovery than assembly work.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0