Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
47/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Drosophila melanogaster whole-genome sequencing dataset generated on the Illumina Genome Analyzer II platform yields 16.8 million reads (2.52 billion bases) with an extrapolated genome coverage of approximately 18× and moderate quality scores (76% Q20 bases). The dataset is findable by organism (D. melanogaster), classic sequencing platform, and WGS application. For comprehensive genomic analyses like structural variant calling or de novo assembly, the moderate coverage and quality may have limitations compared to modern sequencing.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0