Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
47/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This D. melanogaster WGS dataset from the Illumina Genome Analyzer II platform contains 16.8 million reads (2.52 billion bases) with extrapolated 18× coverage and moderate quality (77.5% Q20, 48.7% Q30 bytes). The dataset supports SNP discovery searches though moderate coverage and Q30 scores suggest caution with structural variant calls. Search terms: Drosophila WGS, Genome Analyzer II, lower-coverage genomics.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0