Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
41/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This D. melanogaster WGS dataset from the Illumina Genome Analyzer II platform contains 13.6 million reads (2.04 billion bases) with extrapolated 14.6× coverage and moderate quality (83.3% Q20, 57% Q30 bases). The dataset is searchable by classic Genome Analyzer II sequencing, lower-coverage WGS, and Drosophila genomics. While the depth and quality are sufficient for SNP discovery, the moderate coverage may limit confidence in structural variant detection or comprehensive variant annotation.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0