Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
57/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This D. melanogaster WGS dataset from the Illumina Genome Analyzer II platform contains 17.8 million reads (3.38 billion bases) with extrapolated 24.2× coverage and good quality (80.6% Q20, 68.5% Q30 bases). The dataset is searchable by Drosophila whole-genome sequencing, Genome Analyzer II, and offers reasonable depth for variant mapping. Notably, this sample shows elevated Q30 performance (68.5%) relative to some Genome Analyzer II runs, enhancing confidence in called variants.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0