Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
56/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This D. melanogaster WGS dataset from the Illumina Genome Analyzer II platform contains 21.6 million reads (3.24 billion bases) with extrapolated 23.1× coverage and good quality (83.4% Q20, 58.4% Q30 bytes). The dataset supports searches for Drosophila whole-genome sequencing, Genome Analyzer II, and moderate-depth resequencing projects. While adequate for SNP discovery, the Q30 performance (58.4%) suggests some caution with high-confidence structural variant calls.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0