Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
65/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This D. melanogaster WGS dataset from the Illumina Genome Analyzer II platform contains 53.8 million reads (11.22 billion bases) with high extrapolated coverage (80.2×) and good quality (81.2% Q20, 71.2% Q30 bytes). The very high read count and substantial coverage depth support sensitive variant discovery and genome-wide association studies. Search terms: deep-coverage Drosophila WGS, Genome Analyzer II, comprehensive genomics, reflecting strong utility for population-scale studies.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0