Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
70/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
EST/454 sequencing of Zostera marina, 867k long reads (418 bp mean). Grade C (70/100) driven by Q30 of 75.9% (measured, scored 30/100)—below premium standards but acceptable for EST assembly. Mean base quality of 33.9 is respectable; the 454 platform's inherent limitations and 17.6% duplication are typical for this assay type.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0