Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
43/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina Genome Analyzer II WGS of Drosophila melanogaster provides ~2.3 Gb from ~31 million reads at 16.9× coverage with low quality (77.6% Q20, 45.5% Q30), representing marginal-quality fly-genome data from older sequencing. Researchers should approach this dataset cautiously for variant calling. Researchers interested in legacy Drosophila data will find this useful for validation only.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0