Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
40/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Short-read WGS of Drosophila melanogaster on Illumina Genome Analyzer II with moderate quality (79.4% Q20, 48.5% Q30) and low coverage (14.4×) provides limited sensitivity for variant discovery. This dataset is adequate for rough genome surveys and comparative mapping but insufficient for comprehensive SNP calling or population-level whole-genome sequencing in this model organism.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0