Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
37/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Short-read WGS of Drosophila melanogaster generated on an Illumina Genome Analyzer with 12.7× estimated coverage; the high N-content (7.57%) and absence of Q20/Q30 base metrics signal quality concerns that limit its utility for variant calling or genome assembly. This early-generation platform dataset is best suited for rough genomic surveys or as a reference for comparative whole-genome sequencing studies, though users should validate findings with higher-confidence data.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0