Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
39/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This D. melanogaster WGS dataset from the Illumina Genome Analyzer platform contains 52.2 million reads (1.88 billion bases) with extrapolated 13.4× coverage and moderate quality (78.1% Q20, zero Q30 reported). The very large read count but lower coverage depth and quality present trade-offs for variant discovery. Search terms: Drosophila WGS, Genome Analyzer, moderate-coverage genomics, requires quality filtering.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0