← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
75/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Drosophila melanogaster
Instrument
Illumina Genome Analyzer II
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
10968649490
reported
total reads
47128319
reported
mean coverage
78.3
extrapolated
n content pct
0.085
measured
pct q20 bases
88
measured
pct q30 bases
81
measured
gc content pct
36.6
measured
mean read length
115.2
measured
mean base quality
32.3
measured
adapter content pct
0.01
measured
duplication rate pct
29.44
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 75/100
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
78.3
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
81
measured
×1
55%
duplication rate pct
29.44
measured
×0.5
33%
adapter content pct
0.01
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
26 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0