← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
89/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Drosophila melanogaster
Instrument
Illumina Genome Analyzer II
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
3314543312
reported
total reads
21806206
reported
mean coverage
23.7
extrapolated
n content pct
0.514
measured
pct q20 bases
100
measured
pct q30 bases
100
measured
gc content pct
44.5
measured
mean read length
76
measured
mean base quality
30
measured
adapter content pct
0.15
measured
duplication rate pct
3.72
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 89/100
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
23.7
extrapolated
×1.2
71%
pct q30 bases
100
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
3.72
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
0.15
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
24 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0