Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
57/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This D. melanogaster WGS dataset from the Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx platform contains 22.1 million reads (3.36 billion bases) with extrapolated 24× coverage and high quality (81.9% Q20, 48.5% Q30 bases). The dataset supports searches for Drosophila genomics, Genome Analyzer IIx sequencing, and moderate-depth whole-genome analysis. The elevated N-content (0.09%) and moderate Q30 percentage suggest this is best suited for SNP calling and basic sequence mapping rather than complex variant annotation.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0