SRX058177

SRA first seen 2015

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

90/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Short-read Drosophila WGS with good 30× coverage and minimal duplication (0.41%). Grade A is driven by solid coverage, but Q30 bases at 84% (the worst-scoring metric) represents the practical ceiling for reuse; note that evidence is provisional due to low evidence_strength (0.61) and extrapolated coverage.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Drosophila melanogaster

Instrument

Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 4231196488 reported

total reads 27836819 reported

mean coverage 30.2 extrapolated

n content pct 0.773 measured

pct q20 bases 91.9 measured

pct q30 bases 84 measured

gc content pct 42.3 measured

mean read length 76 measured

mean base quality 30.6 measured

adapter content pct 0.03 measured

duplication rate pct 0.41 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 90/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 30.2 extrapolated ×1.2 100%

pct q30 bases 84 measured ×1 70%

duplication rate pct 0.41 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0.03 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 40 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0