SRX058186

SRA first seen 2015

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Short-read Drosophila WGS of near-perfect quality with Q30 at 95%, minimal N-content (0.001%), and low duplication (1.65%). All measured metrics are exceptional; evidence is provisional, but this dataset is excellent for reuse.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Drosophila melanogaster

Instrument

Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 5568226336 reported

total reads 36633068 reported

mean coverage 39.8 extrapolated

n content pct 0.001 measured

pct q20 bases 98.4 measured

pct q30 bases 95 measured

gc content pct 41.8 measured

mean read length 76 measured

mean base quality 37.6 measured

adapter content pct 0.01 measured

duplication rate pct 1.65 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 39.8 extrapolated ×1.2 100%

pct q30 bases 95 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 1.65 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0.01 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 40 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0