SRX058188

SRA first seen 2015

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

WGS of Drosophila melanogaster from Genome Analyzer IIx, 31.8M reads, 4.8B bases. Grade A (100/100) with measured Q30 of 95.9% and base quality of 37.9 are perfect; however, evidence strength is low (0.61) because mean coverage (34.5x) is extrapolated rather than measured. Measured QC metrics are excellent, but coverage verification is pending.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Drosophila melanogaster

Instrument

Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 4835234000 reported

total reads 31810750 reported

mean coverage 34.5 extrapolated

n content pct 0.001 measured

pct q20 bases 98.7 measured

pct q30 bases 95.9 measured

gc content pct 42.3 measured

mean read length 76 measured

mean base quality 37.9 measured

adapter content pct 0.02 measured

duplication rate pct 0.96 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 34.5 extrapolated ×1.2 100%

pct q30 bases 95.9 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 0.96 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0.02 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 42 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0