Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
71/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
WGS of Drosophila melanogaster from Genome Analyzer IIx, 12.5M reads. Grade C (71/100) with low evidence strength (0.61); extrapolated mean coverage of 13.5x (scored 25/100) is critically limiting—insufficient depth for reliable variant calling or assembly. Measured Q30 (95.4%) is excellent, but very low coverage is prohibitive; independent depth verification essential.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0